What is real? How do you define real? If you are talking
about what you can touch, see, hear, smell, taste and feel etc, then real is
simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain. We all live in a dream
world just like in matrix movie which is different from the reality. Our whole
perception of the environment of the external world is based on neural signals.
Plato’s famous allegory of cave also illustrates that the world we perceive is
different from the reality. For instance, In Schizophrenics when they have
auditory hallucinations to them, they are real because their primary auditory
cortex is active during hallucinations. Their brains have no means to
distinguish between the sound inputs from the outside world and hallucinations.
Perception is the process by which the cognitive system constructs an internal representation of an outside world. Perceptions are built from sensations (sensory inputs e.g. vision, hearing, touch, taste, smell etc. ) and are influenced by available knowledge, expectations, experiences. In general, perception is the process of interpreting something that we see or hear in mind and use it later to judge and give a verdict on a situation, person, group etc. It involves a sequence of steps: 1) Selection of stimuli in the environment – this mainly happens unconsciously 2) Organizing information about stimuli 3) Interpretation
Perception is based on
internally driven attention (bottom up processing) and influenced by externally
driven attention (top down modulation). Bottom up processing begins with
stimulus itself. It is unidirectional and each successive stage carries out
more complex analysis of the input. Vision as example : Light → Eye →
Retina → Rods & Cones (receptors) → neural activity → primary visual cortex
(lines and edges) → successively higher visual areas (up to “face regions” and
alike)
Top down processing involves use of previous knowledge, expectations and
contextual processing in pattern recognition. “Higher level” brain areas
influence neural processing in lower level perceptual areas. For example,
Understanding difficult handwriting is easier when reading complete sentences
than when reading single and isolated words.
Key Issues in perception:
1) It is not an accurate representation of reality. Instead, perception is an interpretation of sensory input. We know from experiences that senses may deceive us and one and the same input may be interpreted in different ways.
Fig a) It can be interpreted as a duck or rabbit
3) Signal Detection Theory: The ability to identify a stimulus when it is embedded in a distracting background. Eg. 1) You can hear your friend’s conversation even in a loud party.
4) Inattentional blindness: It is a failure to notice something that is completely visible due to lack of attention. Eg. In a study conducted by Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris (1999), participants watched a video of people dressed in black and white passing basketballs. Participants were asked to count the number of times the team in white passed the ball. During the video, a person dressed in a black gorilla costume walks among the two teams. You would think that someone would notice the gorilla, right? Nearly half of the people who watched the video didn’t notice the gorilla at all, despite the fact that he was clearly visible for nine seconds. Because participants were so focused on the number of times the white team was passing the ball, they completely tuned out other visual information.
ψ = f(ϕ)
ψ = percept/behaviour and ϕ =input stimulus
Three central questions in psychophysics:
1)
Detection threshold (Absolute threshold) – What is
the minimum strength of a physical stimulation so that we notice its presence?
Example: Graph of absolute auditory threshold for people of different ages is
shown. It shows that detection threshold increases with aging.
2) Relative threshold
(just noticeable difference or jnd) – smallest detectable
difference between two stimuli. It is
given by Weber law.
I = intensity stimulus 1
∆I = difference in
intensity of stimulus 2
k = constant (Weber’s
constant)
In approximation, the jnd is proportional to the stimulus
intensity. The higher the intensity, the larger the jnd and vice versa.
3) Scaling – How does the
perceived intensity change with a change of the physical stimulus? or How much does the physical
stimulus need to change to perceive a doubled intensity?
It is not linear: For instance
a light twice as intense does not lead to the subjective perception of a light
twice as bright.
By experiments it is found
that the Perception of the sensory events of an action is different for our own
actions and those of others.
Our
own actions are felt “less intense”, because we already expect its effects. For
example: 1) we (usually) can’t tickle ourselves.
2) Lack of this expectation in schizophrenics may explain
why they attribute actions to an outside agent
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you have any doubts. Please let me know..